The Chattybot2000! Stupid names and other things to avoid when creating your Chatbot.

Since the dawn of marketing, we’ve all been in the business of creating a dialogue with our audience. Chatbots offers one of the best…

Smartphone

独家优惠奖金 100% 高达 1 BTC + 180 免费旋转




Can we explain the unexplained?

The theory of the universe as a hologram is amazing and simple at the same time. Albert Einstein’s discoveries elude common sense and yet are a fact that has been experimentally proven. Without going into details, there are some inaccuracies when it comes to the theory of macro and microcosm. Everything should match, but it doesn’t. Although it fits better than Newton’s theories to describe everything, because that’s what we’re talking about as a universal theory.

The fact that almost every building, every machine and everything we manufacture is the result of Newton’s equations is one thing. But the method is different and the truth is different. Newton’s equations are untrue in the context of discovering the nature of things, Albert Einstein ‘s equations about nature tell us more and are experimentally confirmed, however, there are certain aspects of physical theories that cause contradictions. In a word, we don’t know anything about the nature of reality yet. And what is the nature of reality someone will ask? Atoms . Super strings . Time that is relative and dependent on speed. We already know that rather not atoms, the theory of super strings, that is, actually having no size but only point-wise extending throughout the universe energy potential is as fascinating as it is unproven.

One explains a little more than previous theory. Simply more calculations unifying the macro and microcosm match when we use this theory. Experimentally, however, no one can confirm it. This latest theory, trying to unify all facts about nature, says that nature is two-dimensional, it is information from which imaginary images are recorded. It is a bit associated with DNA and RNA and everything fits amazingly. This theory seems to unify everything. We are an illusion but what is an illusion? Am I more united with my smartphone or body? If we believe in mathematics as a method of describing reality, we must admit that its natural environment is two-dimensional space. Actually, everything else is just a variation on this topic.

How to look at paranormal phenomena in this context. Do you trust every fairy who urges us to cast a curse on our enemies. Should I go to an ATM and withdraw it a thousand euros? I do not know? But one thing is certain all mystical and alchemical texts and even biblical: “In the beginning was the word”, they gain new meaning. Intuition did not confuse prophets and mystics. Maybe even the proportions between rational and irrational should be reversed in favor of irrationality. It turns out that the nature of reality is more irrational than we think. What occultists and magicians are doing is taking on an extremely pragmatic, unproven and effective feature for me. Since science itself, described the nature of reality more as information than structure, it gives food for thought to what extent information can have causative power, and to what extent the structure. Since information is an attitude and the information carrier is a hologram, the nature of reality seems to depend more on the mind than we think.

In this context, another fascinating question should be asked: is the mind God, or can the mind, as a potential source of all information, change matter by itself? In this context, Grof’s LSD research is amazing, which shows that we can have phenomenological access to almost any type of experience, from the human embryo to the macrocosm. And the phenomenological descriptions of these experiences coincide with facts. Even in people who previously could not have a clue about the phenomena.

To sum up, science has a great time to discover, a paradigm change awaits us, appreciation of the mind, appreciation of information as a causative role. Appreciation of consciousness. Redefining God. It is a pity that Stephen Hawking said that “ God is not there “. It’s disappointing how closed clans are science? I wonder how he defined God? As a personal God of primitive psychology? It is a pity that he did not notice that this concept has also evolved? God Nature is above all words. Words that mean something and we don’t know what they mean yet.

Add a comment

Related posts:

Make Better Bets

This may seem like a ridiculous statement but understanding and appreciating how Bayesian inferences are being applied by your staff to identify and select talent can significantly improve your…

Reducing Under Delivery and Over Delivery of Ads. in Zomato

My first team at Zomato was AdTech Team. Zomato provide options to merchants to run their Ad. campaigns over Zomato’s app So, first things first, Merchants here are restaurant Owners, chains are…

Info On Weight Loss For Women

Weight loss is a major goal for many women. But it’s important to know that there are many factors involved in achieving your goal. One of the best ways to lose weight is to focus on healthy eating…